Human Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4000 words - 3

Human Rights - Essay Example Further, Section 3, sub section 2, delineated that the validity of this provision of legislation applies to such kind of primary legislation, which could be state courts of member countries, but in no way, could impinges upon enforcement and operation ability of existing laws, that are not in consistency with laws of the ECHR, or in the enforcement of inconsistent lower legislation, should the primary legislation not be competent enough, to take cognisance of such secondary legislation enforcement. Thus effectively, it is seen that apropos HRA 1998, British Courts are themselves required to act compatibly with the Convention, thus putting broader responsibility on them to incorporate and apply the Convention and its elucidation by the European Court of Human Rights. UK courts are also privileged to amend specific provisions of UK laws to make them in line with European Convention, provided it does not disagree with the express intentions of UK Parliament.  2 The main idea behind this however, is that that secondary laws in countries could still co-exist, independent of the fact that ECHR laws are inconsistent with them, or cannot be enforced in certain contexts. 3 Normally it is seen that in case of European Convention laws clashing with State or domestic laws, it is necessary for local laws to be amended in order to provide for implementation of EC laws and conventions. But perhaps this is not applicable in the case of ECHR laws which deal with Human rights. But in the cases of ECHR, it is believed that the verdicts of national courts determine internal laws, and it is to these decisions that law of precedents need to be applied. Therefore, the application of European laws needs to respect the framework of domestic and local laws in its installation and enforcement of diktats. 4 The ECHR broadly lays down the various articles that underpin the enforcement of various human right laws in the United Kingdoms and

Film Theory Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Film Theory - Essay Example Guy does not accept the deal, but Bruno kills the wife anyway; and he stalks Guy for payback. Auteur Theory The auteur theory of film criticism views the director as the master story teller. Each film is compared within a body of work as well as on its own merits. The two main distinctions are the director is either structuring the film to interpret a theme or to present a style, a performance. â€Å"The purpose of criticism thus becomes to uncover behind the superficial contrasts of subject and treatment a hard core of basic and often recondite motifs. The pattern formed by these motifs†¦ is what gives an authors work its particular structure, both defining it internally and distinguishing one body of work from another.† Nowell-Smith quoted (Wollen, 532) The underlying doubt regarding the validity of this theory questions the level of control the director has over the film. Certainly screenwriters, producers, actors and cameramen (Wollen, 540) have some degree of input i n the creative process. This collaboration of talent suggests the director can more easily structure the film through motif and patterns of motif than present a styled performance. In other words, the director is not simply a shepherd leading actors through a script; he is an artist bringing context to the film using his signature style. â€Å"In feature films, the director is God; in documentary films, God is the director.† Sir Alfred Hitchcock The most obvious example of Hitchcock’s quote involves the director’s shot of Bruno choking Guy’s wife to death. Bruno begins to choke her, knocking off her glasses. The shot then changes and the audience observes her death through her own lenses. The glasses were so thick and prominent, they defined her view. A more subtle, but major, example occurred when Guy had a tennis match the day Bruno was to return to the scene of the crime and plant Guy’s lighter as evidence. Bruno delayed his departure to coincid e with nightfall; Hitchcock views evil as operating in the dark. Guy honors his commitment to play the tournament; he changes his style to win early. This strategy backfires and the match goes five sets, losing valuable time for Guy. But because he is the protagonist and a good person, Guy takes time to shake hands with his opponent and thank the chair umpire before a hurried departure. While Guy uses his best effort to win, he could have lost quickly, but he is honorable. Bruno drops the lighter down a sewer grate. The race to recover the lighter more quickly than Guy can win his match ensues. Neither contestant knows the competition exists, but the director plays God with their lives. As Guy tries nobly to win quickly and graciously, Bruno fishes his hand in a storm sewer for his talisman of control. The merry-go-round (carousel) scene allows Hitchcock to turn an icon of childhood pleasure into a menacing deathtrap. Guy and Bruno fight for control of the lighter. The operator is s hot and falls on the speed control lever sending the carousel spinning much too fast. Bruno shoves a child off a horse and Guy takes time to save the boy. Bruno knocks Guy down and they wrestle under the horses’ galloping hooves. A maintenance man crawls under the deck to get to the controls, but stops the machine too fast. Bruno is trapped in the wreckage, lighter in hand. Guy tries to persuade Bruno to confess, but Bruno stays evil to his death. In these scenes, Hitchcock demonstrates his theme of good is polite and brave, evil is manipulative, rude and a bully. He shows he